Disclaimer - from the outset, let it be known that I think the idea of setting out codes of conduct or duty of care manuals, or Faithfulness in Service documents are good ideas. I am also a supporter of safe ministry with young people. I believe that young people need to hear the Gospel and that needs to be done in a safe, loving, God centred environment.
Now... on to my post... Recent events have motivated me to write something on here about safe ministry. For those who don't know what this is basically, it is the name given to all the rules and regulations that the Anglican Church (particularly in Tasmania) has made in an attempt to protect itself from allowing paedophiles into positions of leadership, particularly with children, in the church. I think in Victoria it is called Duty of Care (although I have limited experience working in the Victorian framework, so these reflections come from my time in Tasmania).
Now from the outset I want to say that I wholeheartedly support the sentiment behind safe ministry. That is first and foremost it aims to protect young people from paedophiles. That is a good thing. Second, it aims to protect those of us who work with youth from having accusations made about us. It also educates us on how to avoid ever getting into a situation where as sinful people we might do something stupid! As one youth minister here in Victoria says, we should expect to be the person who falls and then make every effort to make sure we don't! The other useful thing that the safe ministry practices do is screen people and therefore give programs run by our churches a more professional look.
I think we are in a dangerous situation when we can't have an open and honest look at our systems and discuss the pros and cons. However, there are problems with the Safe Ministry protocols in Tasmania. Perhaps which we have to live with, or perhaps which might be able to be changed. Here are what I see as the major problems.
Problem 1. Safe Ministry can be another way of saying No Ministry.
Picture this, you're part of a small Anglican church in a small country town. You love God and you want to see people follow Jesus. You decide to run an after school club but before you can do that you need not only to get the relevant police checks, but also go through the interviews, fill in the paper work, go to the seminar and make sure all your leaders have done the same. Suddenly, you feel like its all too much and too daunting, and that it's going to be easier for you simply to pray, continue going to church and continuing to watch it die as it makes no effort to be relevant or to reach out. I notice in Victoria the process is far simpler. You get a police check and a Working With Children (WWC) card and then your done. The church here also runs a once off 1-1.5hr session to talk about our Duty of Care with young people.
Problem 2. Safe Ministry can lead to low ministry talent managers who are inwardly focused running the church's mission and ministry!
What do I mean by this? The often overwhelming processes of safe ministry makes a lot of work. I was lucky when I was in Tasmania because my church was big enough that someone else worried about Safe Ministry while I got on with business. But in many churches this is not the case. What that means is the time that needs to be spent thinking strategically about why and what ministry and mission is happening in a church gets sidetracked with administration. It can also mean that people who are big picture focussed, who can lead from the front and dream big, are unable to do so, because of the small details required.
3. Safe Ministry can damage actual Ministry when people are unable to focus on the spirit of the law, and get bogged down in details.
It is my view that safe ministry has some ultimate aims. I mentioned them above, to keep people safe from paedophiles, to protect leaders from accusation, and to look professional. It is also my view that the only way to achieve these aims is through authentic Christian discipleship (through teaching people to become like Jesus and through holding them accountable for their thoughts and actions). One of the major problems I saw with Safe Ministry in Tasmania was all the crazy rules that were put in place to achieve these aims. I saw a number of people worried about which way to hug or not hug someone, which way to smile, which way to stand up, which way to sleep at night, which person to take photos of etc. It bordered on ridiculous!
4. The ultimate end of Safe Ministry will be a total inability to share the Gospel with young people. It seems to me that the logical end point of all the developments is that unless you send parents home with an outline of the gospel and all your beliefs, tell them that you are going to share them with their child and get them to sign off then you will be unable to talk about your faith with a young person. Similar to how things are in most State schools these days.
Some might say that it's a cost benefit analysis... risk paedophiles and have lots of ministry or have no paedophiles and still have some ministry. I completely disagree. As I mentioned above, our problems in the past (relating to paedophiles) I don't believe came from the churches lack of procedures (although having procedures in place now is certainly helpful). It came from a church run by weak willed men, unable to stand up for the Gospel, and unable to administer Godly discipline to those who needed it. It resulted from poor discipleship and from a church who had many leaders who were probably of nominal faith.
It makes me very sad when I hear of stories like this one... after a recent camp, there has been advice given against following up youth from a camp because this could look inappropriate... I find it doublely sad because one of the biggest problems with the camping ministry in Tasmania is a lack of follow up.
It is when Safe Ministry overrides common sense and good ministry ideas that I think it has gone way too far. Don't hear me wrong. I am glad that I work in a church that has a system in place that requires a check on my suitability for working with youth. But I don't think that good ministry decisions and practices should be stopped because of an overly legalistic framework. Perhaps it is a little like the Pharisees in Jesus' time. In an effort to be more like God they made up lots of little rules. They then focussed on the rules and not on the God whom the rules were meant to help them serve. Likewise, a church made up a bunch of rules (called Safe Ministry) to help them do Ministry better and more openly. However as time went on they forgot why they made the rules and ended up focussing on the rules and not on the Ministry the rules were meant to serve.
Wednesday, February 06, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
I think there are two mistakes we can make as Christians as we seek to be missionaries or evangelists in our world today. The first...
-
So for those who don't know, here in Hobart we have just run (i think it technically goes until the end of this month) the Jesus All Abo...
-
I've just finished my first ever full blown exegetical sermon series. I decided to tackle Hebrews over eight weeks. You can listen t...
Recent Comments
Categories
youth ministry
Life
theology
culture
ministry
articles
video
sermon/talk
pastors
mission
random
politics
anglicanism
john piper
book review
blog
resources
technology
Tasmania
Mark Driscoll
melbourne
Leadership
history
Seth Godin
greek
Apologetics
links
marriage
movie review
missional communities
worship music
+1
ReplyDeleteI have an unfortunate story about a fellow youth minister here in town that I know. He worked for Youth For Christ so his ministry was at the local high school. He served there for three or four years. He was a very physically affectionate guy, in his late twenties. He would hug people pretty openly and never really thought much of it. I think after a few instances he was approached by his superiors and told that he needs to be careful. About two months ago the administration at the school told him that he was no longer allowed on campus so YFC had to let him go. He hugged a girl who's friend was having seizures to console her and a coach at the school saw and complained.
ReplyDeleteIt is unfortunate because he did nothing "wrong" but the culture we live in today doesn't allow things like that to happen. It isn't just the church, it is the culture at large that has gone too far. The church is trying to protect their workers as much as their children, I think.
But I like this post. It's good to get a conversation going about how Safe Ministry might better be able to function.
Some thoughts 4 Chris:
ReplyDeleteI've grouped some of your thoughts into areas of interest rather than try and overlap ;-)
1. Admin is a drag.
Well sure. Welcome to church ministry. But some people are good at that stuff and can't do youth ministry. They want to help with the ministry, but what can they do if they dislike the little blighters? Run the admin side of our youth please... "Sure, I love that kind of stuff."
2. No safe ministry is good?
Imagine if we didn't have safe ministry protocols: Excellent!
Well, as you specify Tassie a few times, my suggestion would be very... ummm... uninteresting. I would suspect that many people would be looking for reassurance that we cared (we obviously didn't before [sic])and couldn't find it. Therefore the media would still be hammering us, the local Mums would not want to risk sending the kids off to Tommy's youth group (no matter how highly his Mum spoke about her church) and people might actually be 'more' reticent than they already are.
3. Bagging the system.
Always be careful about bagging out the system (as you said originally) because that's what 'they' would do. It undermines the system and leaves a question in people's minds about its effectiveness. I think that the system is so painful to operate under, it must actually be useful. Think about it. :-)
I know a few people who hate Safe Ministry. Why? Because they need to do a police check just to be active in public ministry. It makes me love Safe Ministry protocols more than anything I have seen or heard to date :-) Praise the Lord.
Is the system allowed to be critiqued? Sure. But you can do that without killing the system, and it seems good processes like this are in fact active within the system already.
Good article. A bit repetitive, but it made me think. Ta!
Rob.
Hi Chris,
ReplyDeleteYou will be happy to know that at the recent ACT meeting, it was decided to run awareness and information sessions with leaders on how to do follow up with campers using multimedia - text, email, facebook etc. without creating problems for safe ministry.
Lisa
I find the 'box hug' a helpful habit - it is caring but professional. ;b