If you hang around evangelicals for long enough you will start to here things like, 'Hillsong songs are all Jesus is my boyfriend type songs'. This critic seems to apply to any song where if you replaced the word Jesus or God you could perhaps imagine singing part or all of the song to your boyfriend/girlfriend. For example a song might say, I love Jesus or You (clearly implying God) are my everything.
I would now like to make a radical suggestion. At least a suggestion that is radical to my mind. What if this so called 'Jesus is my boyfriend' critic doesn't actually reveal a shallowness in the songs lyrics but an idol in the heart of the person criticizing. Our society is filled with false ideas about how one person (your boyfriend or girlfriend) can fulfill all your wants and desires, can make you eternally happy, will love you no matter what etc. That's what pop culture sings about all the time (mind you actually mostly these days pop music sings not about relationship but random sex so the critic may also reveal a lack of cultural awareness?). The critique, I can imagine singing this song to my boyfriend, might actually just mean you have bought a lie.
Jesus is the only person who can fulfill all our hopes and dreams. Jesus is the only person who can really love us no matter what we do unconditionally forever. It seems entirely appropriate then to replace the idol of our boyfriend/girlfriend relationships with Jesus who loved us and who we love. That we should make Jesus the object and centre of our love, affection and desire not our boyfriend or girlfriend. Your boyfriend is going to fail you. Jesus will never fail you.
A week or two ago I posted some of my reflections on going to the Men's Shelter run by the Salvation army called the Anchorage. There were a number of comments including some recommended reading.
Just the other day two new books arrived in the mail from the Book Depository for me.
I was also watching this video (see below) about homelessness in America. It reminded me about when I was at Uni studying subjects like Social Policy and in particular some of the stuff I learnt about homelessness there. You are said to be in housing stress (you can read some Australian specific stuff here) if you're paying more than 30% of your income to cover the basic costs of providing a house for yourselves (i.e. just the rent or morgate repayments). If you're paying over 50% you're said to be in significant housing stress. It's easy to see that it's not hard to get into housing stress! For example to take out a small loan that would buy you a one bedroom home about 2hrs drive from Melbourne of 200000 with an interest rate of about 8% you need to repay 1500 a month. To buy anything close to the city or in the Doncaster area you would need a lot more! Which means of course, you have to earn lots to afford a home. It's easy to imagine things could spiral out of control, like the loss of a job causing you to lose your house and become homeless. And perhaps it's sometimes easy to understand why some of the people in our church aren't as generous as we think they ought be.
(HT to the Rethinking Youth Ministry guys for this video)
From Google's CEO:
"If you have something you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place"
That's the exact same advice I give teenagers in our youth group who look a bit tipsy or drunk in Facebook photos.
Aside from that I agree with Steve, that there's something kinda scary about the video where this quote comes from:

The other day over lunch at Ridley I said that if I was church shopping or trying to form an opinion about a church without actually being a part of it I would base it entirely on the website. If the website was cool, I would think the church was cool. If I could make a better website in Microsoft Front Page (does anyone even use that anymore?) then I would probably not rate the church at all. If the church had no website, then I would think they have no idea what life in the 21st Century is all about.
Check out this quote which nicely backs up my opinion:
When we started the church we invested in a designer to develop our stationary and website. Communicate Jesus mentions this often but a good website will drive bodies to your church! Think about it this way – if you spend $1000 on a website (for example, with Clover Sites) and you pick up one member who gives $20 a week, you pay for that investment in one year…oh and they get eternal life and get to go to heaven.Not only is it important, but it might even pay off, in the future and in the here and now.
See the full article here
Note: I say all of this with the realisation that this blog, the HTD Youth Ministry and HTD church at large could easily be accused of having only average websites when compared with the polish of others.
On Monday night, Ellisa and I went along. About once a month (I think) our church goes along to The Anchorage with some nice food and puts on a bit of a supper for the men who live there. We hang out with them for a couple of hours playing poker, or watching tv, or just chatting while they eat. It was a very eye opening experience.
I was struck by a few things. Firstly the men in this shelter are not ‘normal’. That is, it wasn’t a bunch of guys who had just had a bit of a bad run, it was a bunch of guys who mostly had mental issues from a past history of drug use and abuse. Most of them had no idea of what reality was, and many of them would change their stories as they were telling them. The idea that such a person should just toughen up and go get a job, as those on the Right of politics may say, just does not meet the reality of these people. They are unemployable, they have ended up in the Men’s shelter for a reason. But then again if it is the Right who propose simplistic go get a job solutions the Left’s typical solutions of education and money would do little as well I think. No amount of money or education is going to help these men.
I think that this could be part of the reason that our society can’t deal with people like these men of The Anchorage. Our great gods of progress and success are money and education and the self. We either spend lots of money to fix our problems or we educate people to fix our problems. Problem is in some cases people are uneducatable and unable to use money well and they are incapable of caring for themselves. If all the guys in the Anchorage were made Millionaires tomorrow then I suggest they might actually be worse off than they already are.
So what do we do? How do we deal with people like this? When Jesus was on earth he said that there will always be poor people (Mat 26:11; Mark 14:7; John 12:8). In Deuteronomy 15:11 it says something similar and tells us what to do about it, “There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be open-handed toward those of your people who are poor and needy in your land.” I think as Christians then our aim is not to ‘Make Poverty History’, but rather it’s to be generous and open-handed towards the poor and needy in our world. We are to do justice, to love kindness and to walk humbly with our God (Micah 6:8), but I don’t think we need to put our hope in ending world poverty.
Having said that, there will be a time when no one is poor. When no one has to suffer the effects of drug abuse and where everyone will love justice, kindness and walk humbly in the presences of the living God. That time will come after judgement day when Jesus judges this world and recreates a new heaven and new earth. There will be no crying or shame or poverty here. Our hope is in Jesus’ return and our love for him compels us to care for the poor now; to alleviate their situations somewhat but not to hope in it’s eradication on this earth. If you’re moved by poverty then you ought to pray that God would give you boldness to share his good news to everyone you encounter and pray hard that Jesus would return soon! That’s what I’m gonna start doing.
I've seen this video in a couple of places recently and it got me thinking... (watch the video below before continuing).
"Sunday's Coming" Movie Trailer from North Point Media on Vimeo.
Anyway, it got me thinking a few things. But mainly I thought it was a reminder that if we're striving for creativity and relevance and freshness in our services (which we may or may not be) then we actually need to do better than simply modernising the liturgy and dressing cooler. We should also avoid copying another churches culture into our services (i.e. lets meet like Hillsong because they are large).
How do you work out ways of worshiping as a community, particularly of young people, that are relevant and culturally contextualised to your group?
An interesting video I watched over on Michael Hyatt's (CEO of Thomas Nelson Publishing) blog. I found it interesting because I think even though it's primarily about book publishing it has a lot to say about Gen Y in general and the way they are perceived vs. the way they actually think and behave.
(RSS readers may need to click through to the site to see this video)
I wonder if this says something for the content and nature of our youth ministry programs. Do we sometimes focus on youth assuming the first run through is true and forget there is great potential for deep things in Generation Y?
What do you think, do you agree with the forwards or backwards way more?
That ad depicts an Australian cricket fan (the same guy from all the other KFC cricket ads this summer) sitting in a crowd of West Indian supporters who are dancing and singing. They are dancing and singing because they are West Indian cricket fans and that is how they watch the cricket. I think that most Australian cricket fans think this is a cool part of West Indian cricket. I wish it was a part of watching Australian cricket, but we are too reserved for anything like that.
Anyway, in order for the Australian fan to watch the cricket in peace he gives the crowd a bucket of KFC chicken, when they start eating they quieten down. This is the apparent racist part, see this quote by an American radio announcer for example:
"These people, they're so unruly and uncivilized and so rowdy, jumping up and down," U.S. radio announcer Ana Kasparian said, in her criticism. "They just can't sit down unless you give them some ... fried chicken."
But actually Ana Kasparian has severely mis-understood the ad. They are West Indian cricket fans having fun watching the cricket. But our Australian fan can't focus so he gets KFC which quietens them down. This is just like what the same guy has done in all the other KFC ads this summer. He has given his girlfriends parents KFC so he can change the channel on the TV and watch the cricket, he has given a security gaurd KFC so he can sit on the other side of the fence as a fake security gaurd and get an uninterupted view of the cricket. Now, in this ad, he gives chicken to the West Indian crowd so he can watch the cricket.
It's not racist, it's cricket.
It's also not America, it's Australia and I think that racism probably has some cultural elements to it. What's racist in America, due to past cultural history, could be not racist in Australia because we don't share that same cultural history. It probably works both ways.
Here is an American news story on the ad
This story from the Australian is well written and sums up much of what I think.
Here is the actual ad
and here is one of the other KFC cricket summer ads for context and comparison.
The married father-of-two insisted his unusual advice did not break the Bible commandment "Thou shalt not steal" - because God's love for the poor outweighs his love for the rich.
"My advice does not contradict the Bible's eighth commandment because God's love for the poor and despised outweighs the property rights of the rich," he continued.
"Let my words not be misrepresented as a simplistic call for people to shoplift. The observation that shoplifting is the best option that some people are left with is a grim indictment of who we are.
Came across this free e-book by Tim Challies today called Sexual Detox (HT to Mikey). There is one for single and one for married guys.
I highly recommend it and just finished reading it. Only took me about an hour to read.
It had some pretty good things to say about sex and it's purposes and our need to focus on God and his plan and purposes for sex. As someone who sadly is coming into my upcoming marriage with sexual baggage I found it both a challenging and encouraging read. I'm thankful for God's grace to us and I pray that He will help my past not mess up my future too much!
I think the last paragraph sums up the book nicely:
The fact is, God does not give young men free passes when it comes to sin; he does not allow you to run wild for a time and just “get away with it.” Sin carries with it consequences whether you sin at eighteen or eighty. Turn from your sin today. Pursue freedom. Pursue Christ.
One thing really caught my eye when reading this book though, It relates to the quote below. Especially if you are married I'd like to know your thoughts! It seems quite a radical way of thinking about sex to me!
Even if you have no desire to have sex, have sex for your spouse’s sake. Even if neither you nor your spouse have a desire to have sex, have sex for God’s sake out of obedience to him.Discuss...
I saw this at Koorong in Hobart once. It's almost as bad as Sunday School Musical!
See the hompage
So recently it was announced that churches could continue to 'discriminate' and only hire people who hold the same religious convictions as they do to work for them.
This is surely mostly a big debate about nothing. The reason it is heated is because churches and their associated organisations wont hire gay people and the law says this is ok. Melbourne's flagship paper, The Age, has been pretty biased against the church on this one (what's new?). Here are all of the recent articles, I could find, that they've published on the issue. I've categorised them into Anti-church and Pro-Church by which I mean Anti the right for a church organisation to discrimate on the basis of faith or pro that position:
Anti-church: A Betrayal of Faith: The Bishop of Gippsland writes one of the worst articles I've ever seen from a Bishop. Totally hopeless and he'd be doing everyone a favour if he resigned and never spoke in public again.
Hulls lack of courage leaves discrimination entrenched: Editorial piece slamming the churches position.
Government bows to religious right: news article which is totally biased
Church can reject gays, single mums: news article which is... also totally biased. It includes this lovely quote from Rodney Croome (a Tasmanian gay activist), "the right to employment and education is more important than pandering to religious prejudice."
Hang on Rodney, the church isn't saying gay people can't have jobs or get educated. Just that they won't employ them. Surely when the gay lobby hire someone they ask if they believe in the cause?? If I went for a job to work with them and said, by the way I don't agree with you I wouldn't be hired. I'm then discriminated against because of my religious views. Why is it fair for you to do it but not the church?
Balancing religion and rights, the case against discrimination: More of the same from The Age opinion pages.
Pro-church:
Why the Bishop is wrong on faith and rights: A response to that hopeless Bishop's article I mentioned earlier.
Freedom of religion is also a basic right: This article begins with, "Telling a church or a mosque it can't employ people who share its ethos is a bit like telling the Labor Party it must employ Liberals." Hurrah!
Plus there were also some Letters to the editor with 1 pro and 2 anti.
(NOTE: These were all I found when searching theage.com.au with the word discrimination so I might have missed one or two but I think it's a pretty complete list)
Anyway apart from a clearly biased paper. Here are some of my other thoughts:
First of all, churches are still allowed to preach the Gospel and so I can't see why a gay person would want to work for an organisation that says you're lifestyle is opposed to God's plan for the way humans should relate to each other. So that's why I can't really understand why they are so upset about this. It's like I said earlier about me working for the gay lobby. I don't want to and they would never employ me because of my religious beliefs. I'm happy to be discriminated against in that case where we clash ideologically.
Secondly, Jim Wallis makes an interesting point in a recent article on this subject of discrimination. He talks about the difference between providing services and receiving them. He says you should be able to select people who agree with your organisational beliefs but then not discriminate against who receives your services, that is a church based group that finds people jobs should still find gay people jobs but shouldn't be forced to hire someone who totally disagrees with their position. (The first "Pro-Church" article I list argues along similar lines to this!)
I think my view would be similar to Jim Wallis and co.
Here are some statistics about the digital world we now live in to blow your mind!!
HT to Michael Hyatt
Thanks to a friend on Facebook I saw a link to this article about Society, Marriage and God.
"Marriage is part of an earlier notion that women were dependent on men. Women were saying 'if I am going to invest in you by bearing your kids, then you have to commit to me in marriage'. But with women able to earn an equal income, that contract has been weakened."Not sure how successful a single mum with a kid, after her partner walks out on her or she walks out on him will be at earning high level of income and raising a well rounded child...
Seth Godin says:
"All the evidence I've seen shows that positive thinking and confidence improves performance. In anything"
Experience shows this for me particularly in sport. When I do something good on the sports field, then I get better. When I stuff up, I play badly.
Here's my question. If it's true does that mean God wired us that way? And if he did, are Christians good at it? Or do we fall into negative thinking? I'm particularly thinking in terms of sin and our state before God. For example, why is it that in Romans 3:21-26. Every evangelical Christian picks up verse 23 and memorises it, "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God". When the verses immediately preceding and following that verse are actually all about how we are made righteous and justified through faith in Jesus. Yes we are sinful and we deserve death, but it seems to me that Paul is actually encouraging us in our justified and righteous state before God through Jesus. Perhaps that kind of reading of the Bible, might lead to Christians thinking of themselves more positively and therefore they'd rise to the challenge of living for Jesus.

So a lot of people laugh at me when I talk about or tell people that I use and enjoy Twitter.
The biggest criticism I hear of Twitter goes something like this, "I don't want to know what you had for breakfast". First of all, this shows a major misunderstanding of Twitter - Twitter is more about conversations and passing on interesting websites and ideas - and second, for some famous people or Christians who we look up to it can actually be interesting to get an insight into what their lives look like. I know a whole lot more about people like Mark Driscoll, Ed Stetzer, Michael Hyatt, Max Lucado, Don Miller and Doug Fields, because they tell me about their lives on Twitter. This is actually both interesting and refreshing to see lots of what they do is just like me, hang out with their family, friends etc.
Putting this aside there are three other great reasons I like Twitter. First, I've been able to interact with people I would never have if it wasn't for Twitter. I've had conversations on Twitter with John Piper (or the guy who twitters for him at least), David Allen, Alan Hirsch, Lifeway Student Ministry, Rick Smith, Guy Mason, Communicate Jesus (aka Steve Kryger), the Youth Ministry Blog people, to name a few.
The second great reason for my love of Twitter is that I've had consumer problems fixed because of Twitter. Back in March, I was seriously annoyed with The Commonwealth Bank for something they did. I wrote this on Twitter, and then they rang me to sort it out! (I have blogged about that before). Then just last week I tried to reformat my first computer hard-drive. This was going very badly and I tweeted that I needed to find the Drivers for the Medion computer I was playing with. Medion UK replied to that tweet and told me where to get the drivers from. And now that computer works fine!
The third reason is because I have also won a CD through Twitter. It was from Lifeway Student Ministry when I entered a competition on the pastor ran on Twitter only for Youth Pastors.
So I would encourage you to stop bagging twitter, or stop wondering about it and make a commitment to try it out for a month (aiming for 2 tweets a day). And see what happens.
Twitter is all about followers, so at the end of this post I'll give you a great list of people or organisations who are worth following on Twitter. Start interacting with them. You will enjoy it. It's also fine in Twitter land to follow and unfollow (stop following) people. So follow someone, and if they are boring or annoying, simply unfollow them. I have done this several times.
The other thing that most people who use Twitter do is use a 3rd party program. This makes Twitter better. I use TweetDeck. It's the best one I've found. You can download it here
If you want to learn more about Twitter, check out the Mashable Twitter Guide book. It lays out everything you need to know to get started!
So why not head on over to twitter and sign up now?
People worth following:
Me (Chris Bowditch)
HTD Youth (The Youth Ministry I run)
Michael Hyatt (CEO of Thomas Nelson Publishers)
Mashable (The latest info in the world of social media)
Communicate Jesus (Steve Kryger talks Web 2.0, social media and harnessing it for the church)
Rick Warren (Senior Pastor and Founder of Saddleback church, Author of Purpose Driven Life)
Tim Schmoyer (Youth Pastor in USA. Great websites - www.studentministry.org)
Jetstar Airways (Find out when there are cheap flights)
Virgin Blue (Find out when there are cheap flights)
Wayne Schuller (Assistant Minister at Holy Trinity Anglican Church)
Jono Smith (Assistant Minister at Holy Trinity Anglican Church)
Louie Giglio (Founder of the Passion Conference)
Desiring God (John Piper's ministry)
ESV Daily Bible (The Bible is good)
Ed Stetzer (Christian researcher in the USA. Into church planting)
John Piper (Needs no introduction, dead set legend)
Mark Driscoll (Howdy Mars Hill, Pastor of Mars Hill Church Seattle)
Matt Chandler (Pastor of Church in Dallas TX)
Don Miller (Author of many books, eg. Blue Like Jazz, Searching for God Knows What)
Max Lucado (Christian Author)
Rick Smith (American speaker to youth, and theology student)
Google (search engine)
Google Books (cool part of the web, they tweet cool quotes)
VictoriaPolice (Find out all the crazy things that people do in Melbourne)
Victorian Premier (Doesn't really know how to use this, but he might one day)
Kevin Rudd (Australia's Prime Minister, actually really interesting, writes his own tweets too)
Bob Kauflin (American worship pastor)
David Allen (Getting Things Done guy)
Alan Hirsch (Australian Missiologist, founder of FORGE)
Will Briggs (Tasmanian church planter)
Doug Fields (American Youth Pastor, Author of many Youth Ministry books)
Creative Youth Ideas (Tweets ideas about Youth Ministry)
Guy Mason (Melbourne Church planter)
Youth Ministry Blog (A good American youth ministry blog - multi-authored)
You can also go to the Twitter Suggestions section and look for some people there.







