At HTD we have a ministry called Impact, which promotes our engagement in social justice. It’s a great ministry and one of the things that it has got our church involved in is a Salvation Army men's shelter called The Anchorage.
On Monday night, Ellisa and I went along. About once a month (I think) our church goes along to The Anchorage with some nice food and puts on a bit of a supper for the men who live there. We hang out with them for a couple of hours playing poker, or watching tv, or just chatting while they eat. It was a very eye opening experience.
I was struck by a few things. Firstly the men in this shelter are not ‘normal’. That is, it wasn’t a bunch of guys who had just had a bit of a bad run, it was a bunch of guys who mostly had mental issues from a past history of drug use and abuse. Most of them had no idea of what reality was, and many of them would change their stories as they were telling them. The idea that such a person should just toughen up and go get a job, as those on the Right of politics may say, just does not meet the reality of these people. They are unemployable, they have ended up in the Men’s shelter for a reason. But then again if it is the Right who propose simplistic go get a job solutions the Left’s typical solutions of education and money would do little as well I think. No amount of money or education is going to help these men.
I think that this could be part of the reason that our society can’t deal with people like these men of The Anchorage. Our great gods of progress and success are money and education and the self. We either spend lots of money to fix our problems or we educate people to fix our problems. Problem is in some cases people are uneducatable and unable to use money well and they are incapable of caring for themselves. If all the guys in the Anchorage were made Millionaires tomorrow then I suggest they might actually be worse off than they already are.
So what do we do? How do we deal with people like this? When Jesus was on earth he said that there will always be poor people (Mat 26:11; Mark 14:7; John 12:8). In Deuteronomy 15:11 it says something similar and tells us what to do about it, “There will always be poor people in the land. Therefore I command you to be open-handed toward those of your people who are poor and needy in your land.” I think as Christians then our aim is not to ‘Make Poverty History’, but rather it’s to be generous and open-handed towards the poor and needy in our world. We are to do justice, to love kindness and to walk humbly with our God (Micah 6:8), but I don’t think we need to put our hope in ending world poverty.
Having said that, there will be a time when no one is poor. When no one has to suffer the effects of drug abuse and where everyone will love justice, kindness and walk humbly in the presences of the living God. That time will come after judgement day when Jesus judges this world and recreates a new heaven and new earth. There will be no crying or shame or poverty here. Our hope is in Jesus’ return and our love for him compels us to care for the poor now; to alleviate their situations somewhat but not to hope in it’s eradication on this earth. If you’re moved by poverty then you ought to pray that God would give you boldness to share his good news to everyone you encounter and pray hard that Jesus would return soon! That’s what I’m gonna start doing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
I think there are two mistakes we can make as Christians as we seek to be missionaries or evangelists in our world today. The first...
-
So for those who don't know, here in Hobart we have just run (i think it technically goes until the end of this month) the Jesus All Abo...
-
I've just finished my first ever full blown exegetical sermon series. I decided to tackle Hebrews over eight weeks. You can listen t...
Recent Comments
Categories
youth ministry
Life
theology
culture
ministry
articles
video
sermon/talk
pastors
mission
random
politics
anglicanism
john piper
book review
blog
resources
technology
Tasmania
Mark Driscoll
melbourne
Leadership
history
Seth Godin
greek
Apologetics
links
marriage
movie review
missional communities
worship music
Hey Chris,
ReplyDeleteGreat article, you've really touched on some of the challenges of this ministry for us. Sometimes it can seem quite futile because the problems facing these guys are so incredibly cyclical and entrenched. But when you boil it down acting out God's love and mercy is an act of obedience. Unfortunately we're never gonna fix things, but all we can do is keep serving and sharing with guys like those at the Anchorage. And yeah, hope that Jesus comes and fixes it soon!
Thanks for coming along, and for your support of Impact
You might reconsider what is meant by "poverty."
ReplyDeleteJean Vanier in his book From Brokenness to Community touches on this well. He would say that true poverty is loneliness and true wealth is Christian community.
"For twenty-five years now I have had the privilege of living with men and women with disabilities. I have discovered that even though a person may have severe brain damage, that is not the source of his or her greatest pain. The greatest pain is rejection, the feeling that nobody really wants you "like that." The feeling that you are seen as ugly, dirty, a burden, of no value. That is the pain I have discovered in the hearts of our people."
I could recommend some books by people who live and work with the poor here in the US that have some really valuable insights on how to live, work, and learn with the most broken of those around us. I don't know how well their practices transfer country to country with a difference in approach to social services and such. Not all of these men you saw are employable, but not all of them are beyond help either (well none of them are beyond entering into community as a contributing member).
Thanks for posting this, Chris. It's something very close to my heart.
Christopher
ReplyDeleteGoing to The Anchorage was obviously a very significant experience for you.
What you say is true - there are some problems that money can not solve, and this side of Jesus' return poverty will always be a reality in our midst. Many years ago in the Philippines, I had a conversation with a theology teacher in which we reflected on the meaning of Jesus' words 'the poor you will always have with you'. His line was that while he acknowledged the truth of the words, he said they are with us as a judgment on our selfishness.
Micah's call to do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with God stands before us as a constant challenge to live sacrificially and give generously to do what is within our power to overcome the extreme poverty that many people unnecessarily suffer. Some poverty will never be history, but those of us who are Christians living in affluent parts of the world have a particular responsibility to do what we can to alleviate or eradicate it.
Recommended reading: 'Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger'. Its been around for ages but I believe a new edition has been released this century. Wendy Greenwood has written a review of it in the latest TEAR magazine:
http://www.tear.org.au/target/articles/rich-christians-in-an-age-of-hunger/
Ron Sider, the author of 'Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger' is touring Melbourne in June. It would be worth attending one of his events. Look them up on FB.
ReplyDeleteHey Chris,
ReplyDeleteI think your use of the words 'normal' and 'deal' make me feel pretty uncomfortable in regards to many of the homeless men that I am friends with.
I don't 'deal' with you, you don't 'deal' with your mates. We can 'work with', 'work for', 'support', 'encourage', 'love' people who may be unwell, struggling with mental health issues or homelessness (most studies show that the two are two closely intwined to be measured seperately). Jesus didn't say 'this is how you should deal with one another' or 'This is how you should deal with smelly homeless people'.
I think it's fantastic that you have been a part of this ministry. Just be weary of the language that you use about people and when speaking to them. The likelihood that they will get on your blog and be able to defend themselves well or see your interpretations of their situations means that you have the power in the situation. Indeed we often do, so let's use it wisely and with compassion. Seeing people as God sees them-us all-as broken but so deserving of love and respect.
Keep up the great work though, and make some friends!
Emma
Thanks for commenting everyone.
ReplyDeleteFirstly, this morning I've bought both books that were recommended so I'll be reading them sometime this year...
I can see that the language we use when talking about those who are mentally ill or homeless can be part of the problem of their isolation or marginalisation, i.e. us and them, normal and abnormal etc. By putting normal inside quotation marks I was hoping to convey my uneasiness with that label, albeit the one our society gives them.
I think when I said deal I had more of a help them kinda idea in my mind rather than a make them go away kinda deal with idea.
I enjoyed meeting these guys and I had some great conversations about holidaying in Tasmania, how cool Bear Grylls is, and how awesome it would be to work on Myth Busters. I'm glad our church is involved in this work.
Ps. I did a post on issues of poverty and youth ministry a while back here: http://www.youthministryandme.com/2008/02/youth-ministry-and-poor.html
which books did you buy chris? I might have a look at Library Bowditch next time i'm over...
ReplyDeleteI bought:
ReplyDeleteJean Vanier - From Brokenness to Community and
Ron Sider - Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger
but sadly I can't make it to any of his speaking engagements in Australia
Anglicans often talk a lot about diversity amidst unity (or vice versa). The big question is when do we become so diverse that we cease to be authentically Anglican (however defined)! It's a question I have struggled with for almost 40 years. The anwers people give seem to be constantly changing as we accommodate ourselves to the growing 'diversity' of the worldwide Anglican Church.
ReplyDeleteThe question I want to throw into this forum is what can we with integrity discard that is part of Anglican heritage and still call ourselves Anglican? A question that might be considered in terms of theology, liturgy and morality, etc.
I'd love to hear what people think - Chris is raising some interesting questions. Please give him the space to explore the issues.