Ok, so part of me feels horribly nervous about this post. Especially given I'm still in the early stages of germinating thought over this. But over the last two weeks I've had a number of things in my life and learning come together which has made me decide that I believe in a big gospel.
What do I mean by a big gospel? I mean that the good news that Jesus died on a cross to save me is not the sum total of the gospel. Rather, the gospel is the good news of God's kingdom which brings salvation to me and you through the death and resurrection of Christ. But it is also the good news of God's kingdom breaking into this world through the life of kingdom people, through the transformation of lives, through the feeding of the sick and helping of the needy, through the worship of the King of Kings... That is it think what is often called the 'fruit' of the gospel is actually part of the gospel itself. A bit like how the fruit of a tree is part of the tree itself.
Let me explain some of the practical things that have pushed me in this direction:
1. A Testimony - This was actually the last thing that happened but it was stunning given my previous week. Anyway, I listened to the most beautiful and amazing testimony of some Muslim friends. Their story is nothing but miraculous. The fascinating thing about it was, being Muslims their conversion moment happened when they realised Jesus was God. That was the big deal thing for them. That was the thing they struggled to accept. That was the thing that God worked powerfully to convince them of. It was only months later as they passionately worshipped and served in their church that they realised not only was Jesus God, but he had died for their sin too. Now they had already surrendered their life to Jesus when they decided he was God. But on a narrow view of the gospel, were they saved yet? It is clear in their story that they were saved before realised Jesus died to forgive them. Knowing that Jesus was God was the high point. That was the moment. It was as they recounted that moment where they cried and we cried as we listened to this testimony of the power of God. A narrow 'mechanics of salvation' view of the gospel doesn't allow for this sort of story. Though they were equally amazed when they discovered why Jesus had to die and what it meant. But it wasn't their conversion moment. I can't reconcile that story on a 'narrow' or 'mechanics of salvation' gospel.
2. Church Planting... In my church planting class we discussed how do you contextualise the gospel to your receptor culture (the people you're trying to reach). How do you communicate in a meaningful way the problem of sin and it's solution. It's difficult to do this in a way that connects with people if you have a narrow view 'mechanics of salvation' view.
3. Christian Worship... Sometimes I find church services horribly one dimensional. Often I can't understand why people get upset when we sing a song like 'Our God' by Chris Tomlin and insist that the only biblical songs are 'Consider Christ' or 'Servants of the Gospel'. I get frustrated when people push that everything must relate to the sermon. Is not our experience of God bigger and broader than what we hear in sermon? Can not other things be impressed upon us? Perhaps these differences come down to a narrow vs. big view of the gospel?
I need to do more work on the theology. That's granted. But I've read some work by Scott McKnight and I find him compelling. He has a new book I plan to read soon. The gospel is the good news of the kingdom.
Some people say it's dangerous to mix the gospel (Jesus died for my salvation) with the 'fruit of the gospel'. I'm unsure where the term 'fruit' of the gospel comes from biblically (granted it may be there), but I don't see how this is dangerous. What is dangerous is not telling the full story. Which of course includes leaving out the great news that Jesus died for our salvation! I'm not suggesting I want to walk away from that at all!
In fact, let me finish the post by saying that the greatest day in my life was when I realised that Jesus had dealt with my sin on the cross. That he paid the price. That I had the chance to live for him because of what he did. That my relationship with God is restored because of that death. I'm moved by this. I cry at the beauty of this when no one is looking. But as I live my new life in God I can't help but see how it is the Gospel the big story of God (the great news that God who created the world, who is redeeming a people for himself, who is bringing peace, justifying sinners, making lives new, transforming relationships, sent his son to live, die rise and ascend) that is infecting every part of my being and life.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
In 2008 I preached this sermon on Dating. I was then a single man and about a month later I put this into practice and started dating Ell...
-
Back in May I preached my first ever topical sermon series which happened to be on Christian faith in the secular workplace. You can li...
-
This Sunday just gone I had the great privilege of preaching on the story of the sinful woman anointing Jesus' feet with oil from Luke 7...
Recent Comments
Categories
youth ministry
Life
theology
culture
ministry
articles
video
sermon/talk
pastors
mission
random
politics
anglicanism
john piper
book review
blog
resources
technology
Tasmania
Mark Driscoll
melbourne
Leadership
history
Seth Godin
greek
Apologetics
links
marriage
movie review
missional communities
worship music
Sounds like good thinking, Chris. I'm part way through Scot McKnight's 'The King Jesus Gospel' - although it looks like he's covered most of it in a talk that Arthur posted ages ago (even the same stories, structure, etc). I feel like this question of what the gospel is is one of the most exciting things we can spend our time considering - I'm so encouraged every time I spend time on it. :)
ReplyDeleteI'm with you on this Chris. From a cross-cultural perspective, 'Jesus died for my sins' is a version of the gospel which is brilliantly contextualised for western, individualistic, legal cultures. But the gospel speaks into other cultures as well and we need to have a definition which is big enough for that!
ReplyDeleteChris, this post has come right in the middle of me having to right my theology essay. The topic: The gospel, human nature, and the Spirit and how it informs our pastoral expectations. I'm dealing with many of the same issues you are currently thinking through. I read King Jesus Gospel (McKnight) earlier in the year and it is quite persuasive. To think that the gospel is simply for my personal salvation and not wider than that seems to wear me a bit thin. However, is it also the "fruit" as you say - i'm not sure. It's certainly big and we read it quite small. Cheers.
ReplyDeleteNicely put Chris. I think as well that if we limit ourselves to merely pushing the 'Jesus die for my sins' aspect of the gospel as Tamie has highlighted then we by default have to de-emphasise the rest-of-life ramifications of the gospel, as it merely cuts short how that simple truth profoundly impacts our lives.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments and feedback so far everyone!
ReplyDeleteChris, thanks for a great, thought-provoking post.
ReplyDeleteHey Chris - yeah i agree that the gospel is a word that can expand to carry more content. It can be as simple as 'Jesus is Lord' (2Cor. 4:3-5, Col 2:5-6) or expand to include his death, burial, and resurrection (1Cor. 15:1-5). Of course, he is declared as Lord by his death & resurrection (Rom 1:3-4, Acts 2:32-36). And so for the Muslims who became Christians (amazing story - praise God!), they still heard the gospel - Jesus is Lord. But there does seem to be a difference between gospel and 'fruit' (Jesus uses the term in John 15). That is, Jesus as my Lord & Saviour leads to a changed life (2Cor. 5:15, Eph 2:8-10). And our changed lives might provoke questions from others, but unless i tell them about Jesus as Lord/Saviour, then they won't know why we live differently and won't be saved (Rom.10:9). Anyway, just thought I'd throw 2 cents (o.k. 10 cents) in - as people have already said, thinking about the gospel is really exciting and important. Thanks for the post. Pricey.
ReplyDeleteOkay, so I missed this discussion, but I want to chime in nonetheless, because I've just been thinking about this myself. Looking at the different ways 'gospel' is used in the Bible, I found the Gospels overwhelming apply it to the whole kingdom of God (e.g. Matt. 24:14, Lk 4:43, Lk 8:1, Lk 16:16), entailing, as you say, all those other aspects like transformation of lives, care for the poor...
ReplyDeleteBut 'gospel' is used very differently in Acts and the epistles. Except in Acts 8:12, it's applied not to the kingdom of God generally, but to Christ (e.g. Acts 8:35, Gal. 1:15-16, Eph. 3:8, Phil. 1:27, 1 Thes. 3:2) and often more specifically to his death and resurrection (1 Cor. 15:1-5, Acts 17:18, 1 Cor. 1:17). The only 'fruit' which it is applied to seems to be that which comes from the cross and resurrection (Eph. 1:13, Eph. 2:16-17). For this reason I take a narrow gospel view.
But, I agree that a big gospel is not dangerous position and the evangelical church is weakened when it downplays wider aspects of the kingdom of God. Everything else we proclaim about the kingdom of God - in words and actions - advances the gospel. We have been sent to proclaim not only the gospel but everything Jesus commanded us (Matt 28:19-20). Hopefully this means you and I reach the same point.